Check out Ross Gittins as he punctures the puffed up sympathy for the elderly that is provoked by Australia’s public conversations about “doing it tough”.
Your sympathy’s too selective. If you really cared you’d give the matter a bit more thought and not be such an emotional easy touch. When it comes to ”hard head, soft heart” you flunk on both. … the game we’re playing isn’t about who’s most vulnerable or needy, it’s about who we feel most sympathy for. And when it comes to the deserving poor, age pensioners win hands down. They’re the most socially acceptable among the needy, the ones most like you and me.
This is great journalism. He neatly disabuses us of the sympathy strings that are jerked by the debate over pension increases. We simply haven’t taken the time to look into the matter and think a bit harder about it. It offers cogent criticism of our federal government’s tactics. Oh, and while we’re at it, also offers some cutting reflections on the experience of being elderly. There’s something here for everyone:
Although like all successful interest groups they feel greatly put upon, the aged are hugely powerful politically. That’s because there are so many of them, they have so much time to worry about the deal they’re getting – there’s something about old age that makes people greedy – and they get so much sympathy from their children and grandchildren.
And just because I’ve loved the time enough to read three news articles on the topic, it doesn’t improve one jot the fact that I am almost completely ignorant of the plight of nearly all of the groups of people that Gittins names.
Filed under: Family, experiences, media , Australian federal government, false sympathy, pension increases, ross gittins
Recent Comments